Current Affairs - Written by Michael Leander Nielsen on Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:59 - 5 Comments
ONCE AGAIN: SUPER BOWL COMMERCIALS FOUND TOO HOT FOR THE NAKED AMERICAN EYE
Super Bowl XLIII, an American football game that will decide the NFL champion for the 2008 season, is scheduled to be played on February 1, 2009.
This years contenders for the title are Pittsburg Steelers and Arizone Cardinals. From a marketing perspective it is interesting that Super Bowl XLIII will also mark the first time that a 30-second commercial time slot will cost (excluding production and talent costs) US $3 million. Once again (certain) advertisers are competing to create the most memorable commercial to be shown to millions of viewers.
Commercials banned or not
Super Bowl XLIII will also mark the first time that a 30-second commercial time slot will cost (excluding production and talent costs) US $3 million.
Many traditional advertisers of the game, such as Anheuser-Busch and Pepsi-Cola, are buying multiple ads at discounted rates. Two traditional advertisers, General Motors and FedEx, will pass on the game, citing the current economic crisis as their main reason. Doritos is reprising a contest for a fan-created ad run two years ago, but with a top prize of $1 million provided it wins the USA Today Super Bowl Ad Meter’s number one position. Paramount Pictures confirmed that a preview of the upcoming Star Trek film will also premiere during the game.
Interestingly, every year commercials are banned. And this year is no exception.
PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) with more than two million members and supporters, is the largest animal rights organization in the world. And they are having a go at passing the NBC censorship. Without much luck, it seems.
This video was rejected by NBC censorship:
Here’s an excerpt from PETA’s website;
“Apparently, NBC has something against girls who love their veggies. After we submitted our proposed Super Bowl ad, which features a comely crop of models demonstrating their fondness for fresh produce, NBC nixed the ad, saying it “depicts a level of sexuality exceeding our standards.” No joke, this is straight from NBC—so stop fondling your fruit salad right now and read the list of shots NBC requested we cut before they’d reconsider”
And here is another PETA commercial rejected by NBC
And here is the list. When reading that list one would understand why NBC rejected the commecial:
- licking pumpkin
- touching her breast with her hand while eating broccoli
- pumpkin from behind between legs
- rubbing pelvic region with pumpkin
- screwing herself with broccoli (fuzzy)
- asparagus on her lap appearing as if it is ready to be inserted into vagina
- licking eggplant
- rubbing asparagus on breast
I have to agree with PETA’s statement, though;
“Why so grouchy NBC? Sounds like someone’s not getting enough um…vegetables. I’m thinking network execs could really benefit from a broccoli booty call.”
More banned commercials at Marketingboss TV
5 Comments
Lars
I agree with Lars.
For PETA even to consider placing adds during Super Bowl at some $ 3 mill for each 30 second slot; WOW. They must be really well funded. Or was this yet another deliberate case of producing adds with the sole purpose of being rejected by censorship and in turn hope for the virality to kick-in?
Check out this Super Bowl video for the AUA! With practically the entire nation tuned in, the AUA is using Super Bowl Sunday to spread awareness about prostate cancer. The disease is the second leading cause of cancer death for men in the US. Help spread the word about prostate cancer- early detection can save lives.
YouTube Super Bowl Video-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khCX_8SwtMk
A whole lot to do about nothing actually. Over here in Europe we would never ban such an innocent ad from our television screens. In fact, the only reason we would ban it is because it’s too innocent. Come on guys (and girls), wake up to reality. This is the 21st century we are living in.
http://ginovandewalle.com/superbowl-peta-ad-rejected-by-nbc/
The reason why these ads were rejected is plain and simple: they’re crap. Cheesy titillation based on vague, unscientific, anecdotal nonsense is wafer thin – and I just don’t believe them. You know damn well it was a male team that wrote these slots, a male Creative Director who chose them, a male only team who shot them. PETA, I love what you stand for but these ads dirty your brand and undermine your message. Stay well away from this sort of cheap tactics in future – your job is far too important for this sort of garbage. Wasting your money on dross like this isn’t good for your reputation. Luckily you avoided the crippling media costs and potential PR fiasco that could easily have followed.
Shock me, stun me, entertain me, educate me, engage me, make me smile, make me actually want to do something. I don’t know which is more stomach churning – eating meat or watching a 70s porn pastiche and women getting it on with vegetables…
Leave a Reply
Most Popular Content
- Innovation: Video inside print magazine
- Did you know 4.0 - new version of the Shift video
- Chris Anderson video interview: Free the future of radical price
- Study: Facebook campaign for B2B marketers
- CMO Trends 2010 Survey
- Social media: Sprite takes Youtube and Facebook to the next level
- Internet marketing in Cyprus
- Das neue Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG) – Die neuen Herausforderungen für Vertrieb und Marketing… Von Opt-Out zu Opt-in !
- Cavendish Hotel, London, United Kingdom - video
- The social media revolution video
- Michael Leander talks to Drayton Bird
- Copywriting is also a skill that takes years of practice to become very effectiv...
- Video Marketing is an interesting and very effective way to market affiliate pro...
- I also promote some of my affiliate links on Facebook by making Facebook fan pag...
- Hi, email marketing is one of those topics that seems to go under the radar thes...
- Very interesting- but I could have told you that putting a picture of you on the...
- You also could consider to integrate - on your own webpages - a web application ...
- With Internet marketing, it is really important to think about the customers bec...
- Here is a good one, number one printer in USA sent the client a PDF proof of a 9...
Marketing Metrics - Jul 25, 2009 5:56 - 0 Comments
Hot marketing acronyms: What is RFM - Recency Frequency Monetary?
More In Marketing Metrics
- Surprise: Twitter Refers the LEAST Fickle Video Viewers
- Video in marketing survey
- Hot marketing acronyms: What is CLV - Customer Lifetime Value?
- DEFINITIONS OF MARKETING
- HOT MARKETING ACRONYMS: BOUNCE RATE RELATED TO EMAIL MARKETING
REPORTS - Jul 24, 2009 11:25 - 1 Comment
Social Media Engagement Directly Linked to Financial Success
More In REPORTS
- CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER TRENDS 2009: SURVEY REPORT
- BRITS HAVE MET UP WITH A FRIEND THEY FIRST MADE ON THE INTERNET
- WOMEN IN THE UK: ONLINE FRIENDS OFTEN BECOME REAL FRIENDS
- UK: CONSUMERS WITH SPENDING POWER MORE RESPONSIVE TO ADS ON NICHE SITES THAN PORTALS
- SOCIAL NETWORKING AND BUSINESS: NEW SURVEY
EVENTS, VIDEOS - Nov 7, 2009 8:23 - 4 Comments
Internet marketing in Cyprus
More In EVENTS
- Das neue Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG) – Die neuen Herausforderungen für Vertrieb und Marketing… Von Opt-Out zu Opt-in !
- Webinar 12 January: How to use video in marketing; trends, tips and tricks
- Webinar 11 November 2009: Wie große B2C Unternehmen Ihre CRM Systeme und Data Warehouses für bessere Response- und Konversionsraten nutzen können
- Taktiken zur Conversion Rate Steigerung – Web-Seminar
- Better results with conversion optimization tactics - web seminar

Let’s me wanna ask the PETA folks: do you think it’s only sex that sells? Especially in troubled times like these, I believe that people are highly sensitized to core ethical values. What a wonderful opportunity fo someone like PETA to launch a sensible campaign on the positive effects vegetarian cuisine can have on one’s own body (not just the sex…), to an audience that longs for reassurance on the simple things in life!
I’d say PETA shoud be thankful to NBC for rejecting the ad! Money well saved….